The Five Love Languages Explained

The theory of 5 Love Languages was proposed by Gary Chapman in 1992. Chapman, who worked as a counselor, found that couples were not feeling loved despite their partners believing they were doing all the right things for them.

He found that patterns emerged in what his clients wanted from their partners. Five consistent patterns were found, which then became what he termed the 5 Love Languages.

These are ‘words of affirmation’, ‘quality time’, ‘physical touch’, ‘acts of service’, and ‘receiving gifts.’

Love Languages in Relationships

Chapman concluded that people don’t give and receive love in the same ways and that everyone has a primary love language that speaks to them most deeply.

Essentially, Chapman found that his client’s partners may have been expressing love, but it was not in a meaningful way to their partners. They may instead have been receiving an expression of love that is not connected to their love language.

By finding out people’s love languages and the love language of their partner, Chapman suggests that this can help people ensure that they both truly feel loved.

Chapman explains that falling in love is a ‘temporary emotional high’ and that after the initial emotional obsession has died down, partners must put in the effort to pursue what he terms ‘real love.’

He stated that after time in a relationship, couples might forget how to have meaningful connections with their partners. However, through understanding and practicing their partner’s love language, they can rectify and revive these relationships.

All five love languages are equally important, but people differ on the ones they prefer. Some people may appreciate all five, while others may actively dislike one or more.

Chapman suggested several methods in his 1992 book for discovering people’s love languages. He developed the Five Love Languages Profile, which is an online scale (found here)

Alternatively, individuals can ask themselves some of the following questions:

  • ‘What does your partner do or not do that hurts deeply?’
  • ‘What have you requested that your partner do more often?’
  • ‘How do you regularly express love to your partner?’
  • ‘What would your ideal partner be like?’

These types of questions allow people to see what is important to them and to pinpoint the desired ways they wish to receive love.

Although Chapman’s book was written in 1992, it has continued to help couples today.

Types of love languages

Words of affirmation

Someone whose love language is words of affirmation prefers love to be expressed through spoken words, praise, or appreciation.

They enjoy kind words and encouragement, uplifting quotes, love notes left by their partner, or appreciative text messages.

People who prefer this love language may feel negatively affected by unkind words and may be overly sensitive to criticism from their partner.

A partner of someone who prefers words of affirmation may consider giving compliments, showing an interest shown in something their partner is talking about, and reacting positively to something their partner has accomplished.

They may say ‘I love you,’ ‘I’m proud of you,’ and ‘I appreciate you’ to connect with their partner on a deeper level.

Quality time

If someone’s love language is quality time, they really appreciate love and affection being expressed through undivided attention from their partner.

This is not just being in close proximity to their partner often, but the quality of the closeness.

This can include making eye contact, actively listening, staying present, and focusing on partners. This can also include quality conversations such as sharing thoughts, experiences, feelings, and desires in a deeply personal, welcoming, and uninterrupted context.

If a partner of someone who has this love language is always on their phone during their time together, is condescending, interrupts, or dismisses their partner when they share their feelings, this can make their partner feel unloved.

Instead, being considerate and engaging in supportive listening will make them feel loved. Quality time can also involve couples engaging in activities or hobbies together that show enjoyment of each other’s company.

Physical touch

Those whose primary love language is physical touch feel the most love and appreciation through physical affection.

This does not just have to be sexual intimacy but can include holding hands, hugs, arm and face touches, and putting an arm around your partner in public or when at home, such as when watching a movie together.

Physical touch can communicate comfort to a partner who is upset and happiness or praise when a partner is celebrating.

Simply put, people who prefer physical touch want to feel connected to their partner physically, and it may be important for them to feel physically close to their partner every day.

Acts of service

If someone’s primary love language is acts of service, they may want love expressed to them through their partner helping them out.

This can include their partner doing unexpected, nice things for their partner, working on special projects together, completing chores, and helping with errands.

These usually take the form of the partner doing more than their normal share of responsibilities to relieve pressure or stress from their partner. People with this love language may really appreciate when their partner does something which they may not particularly enjoy just to make their partner’s life easier.

Laziness, broken commitments, and doing more work for their partner may communicate to their partner that their feelings do not matter.

Doing nice and helpful things instead of just talking about doing them can communicate a deeper level of love to their partner.

Receiving gifts

The final love language is receiving gifts. Those with this as their primary love language do not necessarily expect large or expensive gifts but appreciate the thought behind them. If a partner goes out of their way to get them a gift during the course of their day, this communicates to their partner that they were thinking about them.

These can also be gifts of no monetary value, such as finding a beautiful shell on a beach that a partner keeps to give their partner.

People with this love language treasure not only the gift itself but also the time and effort the gift giver put into getting the gift. Gifts could be physical items or even the gift of the partner themselves, such as going to surprise them when they do not expect it.

Partners who appreciate receiving gifts may find they remember every gift they have received because they made such an impact on them. 

Someone with this love language may feel hurt if their partner never brings them meaningful gifts or forgets to give them a gift at special occasions such as birthdays and anniversaries. 

How love languages help relationships

Promotes empathy and selflessness

Using and being committed to understanding another’s love language encourages people to learn to focus on their partner’s needs rather than their own.

Selflessness can be promoted through knowing a person’s love language via time, effort, understanding, and emotional openness. This also encourages partners to step outside themselves and look at what makes another person feel significant.

Being able to view things from someone else’s perspective can promote empathy. If people can empathize with their partner, then they are likely to understand another’s love language and why their partners’ may be different from their own.

Creating empathy for another person can also increase emotional intelligence.

Emotionally intelligent people often put others’ needs before their own, as well as being considerate of others’ perspectives, experiences, and emotions.

Creates more meaningful actions

When couples start to understand and use each other’s love languages more often, the thing they do not only become more intentional but also more meaningful.

By focusing on actions that are known to be more valuable to their partner, time is not wasted on actions that their partner does not appreciate as much.

Encourages self-awareness

Becoming more knowledgeable about how their own and their partner’s love language works can promote self-awareness.

People can become more considerate about how they communicate with their partners, understand what they should or should not do, and make a conscious effort to improve their relationships.

Helps with personal growth

Personal growth can stem from someone being focused on something or someone outside of themselves. Being focused on someone else’s love language can force people to grow and change for the better, to the benefit of their relationship.

The five love languages can also encourage people to love others in ways that they may not have considered before or that are outside of their comfort zone.

Stronger relationships

Putting in time and effort and creating meaningful activities with a partner can strengthen relationships. As they learn more about each other, the intimacy levels, security levels, and happiness of couples should be increased.

Chapman used an analogy of ‘emotional love tanks’ to describe the levels of a couple’s relationships. He stated that low or empty love tanks could cause romantic withdrawal or falling out of love, harsh interactions, or inappropriate behaviors.

Couples with full love tanks, who speak in each other’s love languages, can deal with conflict and cope with their differences. Problems can arise when partners do not know their partner’s love languages or how to use them, so the love tank can empty over time.

However, understanding and learning to use each other’s love languages are necessary for filling the love tank and strengthening relationships.

Are the love languages valid?

Chapman states that the five love languages are a universal construct that can be found in various countries.

Karandashev (2015) argues that love is indeed universal, but it can manifest differently according to different cultures.

For instance, physical touch, such as hugging, can express love in some cultures, but in others, it can be seen as a sexual expression.

Chapman’s theory was based on his own experiences as a counselor and lacked scientific rigor, especially as there is not much research on the five love languages.

One study by Egbert and Polk (2006) tested this validity on students. The results showed that the common love languages expressed by the students matched those of Chapman’s theory; this study is the first empirical support of the theory.

Likewise, Surijah and Septiarly (2016) aimed to validate the love languages theory. The five love languages scale seemed to show a promising reliability score, and there were found to be 17 items on the scale which were valid.

One study on love languages found that if someone perceived that their partner was using their preferred love language well, they had increased feelings of love and relationship satisfaction. This was the case for heterosexual and homosexual couples (Hughes & Camden, 2020).

The same researchers also found that women who perceived their partners were using their preferred love language well reported greater feelings of love compared to men’s perceptions. 

This suggests that love languages may be more effective in improving romantic relationships from a woman’s perspective.

Some issues with the theory are that some people may misuse their love languages, becoming competitive with their partners. Some may keep track of how many actions they have completed for their partner’s love language compared to how many their partner has done, which can put more of a strain on the relationship.

This can also pressure couples if some want their partners to express their love language consistently. Love languages should also not be seen as the main cure for a deteriorating relationship.

This theory may not be able to fix other relationship problems that may exist, and some couples may need further relationship guidance from professionals. For instance, if a relationship is toxic, abusive, or includes gaslighting behaviors, using love languages on their own may not fix the issues.

Love languages should thus be seen as one tool of many to aid communication.

The original model of the love languages written in the 1990s was focused on heterosexual married couples, Chapman often using ‘husbands’ and ‘wives’ when describing the partners.

This can be frustrating for those in homosexual relationships who wish to learn about the theory but may feel excluded.

However, the tools can be used by anyone if they are willing to overlook the heteronormative nature of the theory, as Hughes and Camden (2020) in their research found that homosexual couples benefitted from the love languages as much as heterosexual couples.

Lastly, the original works often described situations and gave advice that adhered to outdated gender stereotypes.

In a 1995 article by Chapman, some quotes included: ‘Isn’t it sweet when every day your wife has the breakfast table set with scrumptious food so you can get a good meal before you go to work…’, and ‘How about sending him food for lunch, or buying her new pots for her kitchen?’.

These gender stereotypes can make it frustrating for women to read, and they may dismiss the theory altogether. It may be that updating the love languages and using more inclusive language would make the theory feel more applicable to the general population.

Taking the outdated views out of consideration, the updated love language rating scales do not appear to be gender specific and can be applicable to anyone in any type of relationship.

Frequently asked questions

Does my love language need to be the same as my partner’s to have a strong relationship?

It can be easier if yours and your partner’s love language align since you are more likely to be aware of what your partner appreciates, if it is similar to what you appreciate.

Despite this, having different love languages does not have to be an issue. As long as the preferred love language is communicated and each person has a good idea of how to show love to their partner, then it is as simple as that.

Issues may only arise if a partner refuses to show their partner’s preferred love language or is not willing to compromise. This can make their partner feel unloved and can breakdown a relationship overtime.

Can love languages be used in other relationships?

Although the original theory discussed the use of love languages between romantic partners, it is possible to use love languages in other relationships: with friends, family members, and co-workers.

For example, if you know that your friend’s love language is words of affirmation, you can ensure you use this with them. You could say tell them ‘I’m so proud of you’, ‘I love spending time with you’, or ‘You’re such a good friend’.

You can even express love languages to yourself. For instance, if your primary love language is receiving gifts, you could treat yourself to something you have wanted for a while or have a day at the spa.

Overall, there are endless ways in which love languages can be expressed to all the people in your life.

Can someone have multiple preferred love languages?

It is very common for people to have a preference for more than one type of love language.

The types may even compliment each other. For examples, if someone’s love languages are quality time and physical touch, these may be easily accommodated for together, for instance, by putting an arm around a partner while watching a movie.

It is also possible for our preferred love language to change over time. This is because our needs and wants constantly change, so the way we receive and show love can also change.


Chapman, G. (1995). The five languages of love. Chicago: Northfield.

Chapman, G. D. (2015). The five love languages: The secret to love that lasts. Northfield Publishing.

Egbert, N., & Polk, D. (2006). Speaking the language of relational maintenance: A validity test of Chapman’s Five Love Languages. Communication Research Reports, 23(1), 19-26.

Hughes, J. L., & Camden, A. A. (2020). Using Chapman’s Five Love Languages Theory to Predict Love and Relationship Satisfaction. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 25.

Karandashev, V. (2015). A cultural perspective on romantic love. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5(4), 2.

Surijah, E. A., & Septiarly, Y. L. (2016). Construct validation of five love languages. Anima Indonesian Psychological Journal, 31(2), 65-76.

What’s Your Love Language?

Saul Mcleod, PhD

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Educator, Researcher

Saul Mcleod, Ph.D., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years experience of working in further and higher education.

Olivia Guy-Evans

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons), Psychology, MSc, Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.